Planet Hunters Talk
D'oh! It all makes sense now. Eclipsing binary with a period longer than the observation baseline.
Q0-1 #eclipsingbinary
Q0-1 #transitingplanet
Q0-1 Pulsating variable.
Q1-1 Strongly disagree with heartbeat star assertion.
Q0-1 Definitely a #transitingplanet
Q0-1 The duration of the two transits are different. Are these two different transiting objects? Transits are real deep though. Small star?
Q0-1 Could be a transit, could be statistical noise. Who knows.
Q0-1 #eclipsingbinary in a ~2 day orbit.
Q0-1 #pulsating
Pulsating variable.
Q0-1 #eclipsingbinary. Pretty low radius ratio.
Q14-1 Flares at 2.5d, 4.75d, 25.25d. Very clear ΔF~0.0038#transit signature at 10d.
Q0-1 #variable
Q0-1 Rotational modulation?
Q0-1 Pulsating variable + rotational modulation?
Q0-1 Not convinced it's a flare - ramps up, not down.
Q0-1 Strongly disagree with Hearbeat assertion. Light curve doesn't resemble heartbeat star at all.
Q0-1 #transit at 16.5 d.
Q0-1 #flare at 32.5 d. Pulsating star.
Q11-1 #transit. Not particularly obvious at first.
Q10-1 #simulated #transit is obvious at 26 days.
Q0-1 Disagree with Heartbeat star assertion. Not a sinusoidal pattern with trended amplitude. Looks more like systemics as we see elsewhere.
Rotational modulation?
Q0-1 Disagree with assertion of flares. Looks more like a systemic effect.
Q0-1 Pulsating.
Q0-1 Disagree with previous assertion of cepheid variability. Lots of scatter in the data, no evidence of real variability.
Q0-1 Possible #transit on day 1. Can't be sure it's not just noise.
Q0-1 Irregularly pulsating star.
Q0-1 #transit at ~16.5 d.
Q0-1 ΔF~0.0083 transit at ~16.75 d.
Q0-1 Pulsating variable
Q0-1 variable.
Q0-1 pulsating variable star.
Q0-1 possible flare at 16 days
Q0-1 unremarkable star, possible starspot modulation.
Q0-1 #flare
Q0-1 #variable, #flare on day 6.
Q0-1 Possible #transit of a ~7-8 day planet.
ΔF ~ 0.0077 #transit at ~ 16.625 d. High impact parameter.
#variable
#flare , and of course the simulated transit.
Light curve looks like Chi Cyg.
#transitingplanet ?
Q4-1 #flare
Flagged a few Δ's, possibly statistical noise, though they do look almost periodic.
I can just about convince myself that I see a ~regularly repeating transit-like signal. A shame this doesn't have de-trending and LC folding
It looks like two transits in the beginning, but with as smoothe as the better data is toward the end, it's hard to believe they're real.
#eclipsingbinary Interesting that there's a lot of scatter right after primary eclipse, but less so after secondary eclipse.
Q0-1 Starspot modulation + differential rotation?
Possible transit, but too little information to be confident.
#variable Starspot modulation?
Possible transit signature. Too little data to be confident.
Period says eclipsing binary, ΔF says planet. Might be one of those <1d ~Earths that Kepler has been finding.
Systematic effect messing with the data, so this could be a spurious transit signature.
#eclipsingbinary with ~1.75 d period.
#Variable
Q0-1 Pretty unremarkable. Nearby Jupiter may be causing photometric trend.
Q0-1 Starspot activity and associated photometric modulation?
Q0-1 Clear sinusoidal variation - spot activity? Trend in data due to Jupiter in the K0 field?
Q0-1 Significant starspot activity and associated photometric modulation?
Q0-1 With only a couple low datapoints, it's conceivable this is simply an artifact.
D'oh! It all makes sense now. Eclipsing binary with a period longer than the observation baseline.
Q0-1 #eclipsingbinary
Q0-1 #eclipsingbinary
Q0-1 #transitingplanet
Q0-1 #transitingplanet
Q0-1 Pulsating variable.
Q1-1 Strongly disagree with heartbeat star assertion.
Q0-1 Definitely a #transitingplanet
Q0-1 The duration of the two transits are different. Are these two different transiting objects? Transits are real deep though. Small star?
Q0-1 Could be a transit, could be statistical noise. Who knows.
Q0-1 #eclipsingbinary in a ~2 day orbit.
Q0-1 #pulsating
Pulsating variable.
Q0-1 #eclipsingbinary. Pretty low radius ratio.
Q14-1 Flares at 2.5d, 4.75d, 25.25d. Very clear ΔF~0.0038#transit signature at 10d.
Q0-1 #variable
Q0-1 #transitingplanet
Q0-1 Rotational modulation?
Q0-1 #eclipsingbinary
Q0-1 #variable
Q0-1 Pulsating variable + rotational modulation?
Q0-1 Not convinced it's a flare - ramps up, not down.
Q0-1 #variable
Q0-1 #variable
Q0-1 Strongly disagree with Hearbeat assertion. Light curve doesn't resemble heartbeat star at all.
Q0-1 #variable
Q0-1 #transit at 16.5 d.
Q0-1 #flare at 32.5 d. Pulsating star.
Q11-1 #transit. Not particularly obvious at first.
Q10-1 #simulated #transit is obvious at 26 days.
Q0-1 Disagree with Heartbeat star assertion. Not a sinusoidal pattern with trended amplitude. Looks more like systemics as we see elsewhere.
Rotational modulation?
Q0-1 Disagree with assertion of flares. Looks more like a systemic effect.
Q0-1 Pulsating.
Q0-1 Disagree with previous assertion of cepheid variability. Lots of scatter in the data, no evidence of real variability.
Q0-1 Possible #transit on day 1. Can't be sure it's not just noise.
Q0-1 Irregularly pulsating star.
Q0-1 #transit at ~16.5 d.
Q0-1 ΔF~0.0083 transit at ~16.75 d.
Q0-1 Pulsating variable
Q0-1 variable.
Q0-1 pulsating variable star.
Q0-1 possible flare at 16 days
Q0-1 unremarkable star, possible starspot modulation.
Q0-1 #flare
Q0-1 #eclipsingbinary
Q0-1 #variable, #flare on day 6.
Q0-1 Possible #transit of a ~7-8 day planet.
ΔF ~ 0.0077 #transit at ~ 16.625 d. High impact parameter.
Q0-1 #pulsating
Q0-1 #pulsating
#variable
Q0-1 #pulsating
Q0-1 #pulsating
Q0-1 #pulsating
#variable
#flare , and of course the simulated transit.
Light curve looks like Chi Cyg.
Q0-1 #pulsating
#transitingplanet ?
Q4-1 #flare
Q0-1 #flare
Flagged a few Δ's, possibly statistical noise, though they do look almost periodic.
I can just about convince myself that I see a ~regularly repeating transit-like signal. A shame this doesn't have de-trending and LC folding
#variable
It looks like two transits in the beginning, but with as smoothe as the better data is toward the end, it's hard to believe they're real.
#eclipsingbinary
Interesting that there's a lot of scatter right after primary eclipse, but less so after secondary eclipse.
Q0-1 Starspot modulation + differential rotation?
Possible transit, but too little information to be confident.
#variable Starspot modulation?
Possible transit signature. Too little data to be confident.
Period says eclipsing binary, ΔF says planet. Might be one of those <1d ~Earths that Kepler has been finding.
Systematic effect messing with the data, so this could be a spurious transit signature.
#eclipsingbinary with ~1.75 d period.
#Variable
Q0-1 Pretty unremarkable. Nearby Jupiter may be causing photometric trend.
Q0-1 Starspot activity and associated photometric modulation?
Q0-1 Clear sinusoidal variation - spot activity? Trend in data due to Jupiter in the K0 field?
Q0-1 Significant starspot activity and associated photometric modulation?
Q0-1 With only a couple low datapoints, it's conceivable this is simply an artifact.