Planet Hunters Talk

Kepler GO Finds

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    Data courtesy Tom Jocobs and Al Schmitt's LcViewer.

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 4581084 maybe P=185.02 days, starting at 677.04, duration 12.3 hours, depth 0.0006, R=0.49 R_Earth (!). This is my smallest candidate so far, the star is only 0.183 R_sol, so this is a bit speculative of course.

    Posted

  • JKD by JKD

    KID 2569995 maybe a PC with P=80.8x d starting at 1309.11 BKJD, 3 obviously similar signals and a 4th, which is somehow different/hidden

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans in response to JKD's comment.

    Dear JKD

    yes, KID 2569995 has P=80.872 days, but MAST gives R_star=1.6 R_sol, which gives an estimate R_planet=22 R_Earth, which is too large for a planet, so I assume it's an EB, or rather contamination by one, since it is classified as "InCat=False" in the Kepler EB catalog http://keplerebs.villanova.edu/

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 6268411 maybe single transit at 576.88, duration 20.6 hours, depth 0.0033, R=1.1 R_Earth estimate. The star is small, with a radius of 0.189 R_sol, mass 0.166 M_sol, temp 3214 K. Kian Jin Planetary Calculator gives then an estimate of a=11.7 au, P around 98 years. Too cold for comfort...

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 6277788 maybe single transit at 1425.0, duration 20.0 hours, depth 0.0017, R_planet 5.2 R_Earth estimate. The star has radius 1.146 R_sol, mass 1.17 M_sol, temp 6509 K, 15.121 mag. This gives an estimate of P=1033 days, temp planet about 210 K (maybe still in the habitable zone).

    Posted

  • JKD by JKD

    Trinary

    KID 7108433 is marked as an EB.

    A minimal TTV can be detected.

    However, it is obviously an EB with a third object around.

    Single signal at S =1246.655 BKJD, Duration =3.9234 hrs, Depth ~14.2% and a marginal signal-shoulder at 1183.10 BKJD

    Likely a Trinary

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans in response to JKD's comment.

    Dear JKD

    yes, KID 7108433 is an interesting system. Maybe we have a secondary eclipse of the additional star at BKJD 1239.96, duration about 3.9 hours, depth 0.0149.

    7108433

    Unfortunately it turns out the the features are NOT visible in the SAP_FLUX data, so it seems it could be contamination of some sort. Tom Jacobs and Saul Rappaport took the trouble to investigate this star further to gether with Tamas Borkovits.

    Posted

  • JKD by JKD

    KID 8519065 looks like a transit at S=323.90 BKJD, Duration min.18.6 hrs, Depth min.1.4%

    KID 8844362 pot. PC at S=1403.84 BKJD, Duration ~22.06 hrs, Depth =0.6%

    KID 9838424 pot. PC at S=1572.01 BKJD, Duration ~4.90 hrs, Depth ~0.1%

    KID 9843294 pot. PC at S=1572.73 BKJD, Duration ~3.43 hrs, Depth ~0.14%

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans in response to JKD's comment.

    KID 8844362 is too large for a PC, R_star = 28.4 * R_sol.

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans in response to JKD's comment.

    KID 9838424 looks possible. Maybe P=80.33 days, starting at 1331.03, duration 3-4 hours, depth about 0.0014, U-shaped. Possibly strong TTV's.

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 6460812 P=0.5002 days, starting at 1274.26, duration 3.9 hours, depth 0.0022, 2.9 R-Earth estimate. Maybe a "corona-burner" or binary or contamination by a BGEB.

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 7467076 maybe long transit at 1442.57, duration 86.3 hours, depth 0.0017, 13.1 R_Earth estimate. Since the star is R_star = 2.875 R_sol, we have a planet candidate with P=25.5 years, 11 au from the star, a bit similar to our Jupiter.

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 8153568 , EB with interesting pulsations. P=3.6071431 days. KOI 6051.

    EB

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 8523491 Maybe single long transit at 489.95, duration 85.8 hours, depth 0.0027, 13.7 R_Earth estimate.

    8523491

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 8561192 looks very similar to KID 8153568 , but has a somewhat sorter period. P=2.7425932 days. KOI 5544.

    8561192

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 9517176 Maybe transit at 374.64, duration 37.76 hours, depth 0.0035, 4.94 R_Earth.

    9517176

    Zoom into LC:

    zoom

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 9899345 P=1.3322 days, starting at 1472.63, duration 6.375 hours, depth 0.0024, R=9.04 R_Earth estimate.

    9899345

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 10403228 it looks like an EB eclipse at 744.85, duration 42.2 hours, depth 0.045, 7.2 R_Earth estimate, but could be a PC instead. It is marked as "InCat=False" in the Kepler EB catalog. It could just be contamination of course.

    10403228

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 10456779 Maybe transit at 712.97, duration 4.9 hours, depth 0.0049, 1.05 R_Earth estimate. A bit speculative of course with such a small body.

    10456779

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 10815060 maybe transit at 1235.48, duration 29.4 hours, depth 0.001, 3.5 R_Earth estimate.

    Posted

  • zoo3hans by zoo3hans

    KID 11234225 Maybe single long transit at 1037.74, duration 103.96 hours, depth 0.0013, 6.07 R_Earth estimate.

    10815060

    Posted

  • JKD by JKD

    KID 11963106 is a potential PC

    S1 = 651.10 BKJD, P = 213.97 d, Duration = 9.31 hrs, Depth = 0.38%

    Posted

  • Artman40 by Artman40

    A new Kepler data release should happen during this week. Will this be the final data release?

    Posted

  • Artman40 by Artman40

    http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/docs/exonews_archive.html

    A new Kepler data release!

    The new KOI hosts have KOI numbers between 7621 and 8297.

    ~160 of those new KOIs are considered candidates. The rest are considered false positives.

    Posted

  • Artman40 by Artman40

    Note:

    http://archive.stsci.edu/kepler/missing_lc.html

    More than 50 previously unprocessed light curves from Kepler's original field have been released. Processing algorithms missed them before.

    Posted

  • ProtoJeb21 by ProtoJeb21

    @zoo3hans are these found by randomly putting in KIC values, or are these stars targeted because they have missing data from multiple quarters?

    Posted

  • ProtoJeb21 by ProtoJeb21 in response to JKD's comment.

    I may have found an orbital period for your candidate around KIC 9838424. With LcViewer your transit has a duration of ~3.4 hours, and a similar transit is found at epoch 1274.58895. This gives the planet a year of 297.438925 days, sigma 3.56. Looks like an ice giant at the outer edge of the system's habitable zone. Host star is unusually hot (5370*K) for its size (0.57 solar radii).

    Posted