Planet Hunters Talk

EPIC no: 205046529

  • broder_fisk by broder_fisk

    http://talk.planethunters.org/#/subjects/APH0000l6o?quarter=1-2

    This one has an interesting curve. If you look at all 3 images (and zoom in), it has several dips but it doesn't look like an eclipsingbinary and there are many of them, so they might be something other than planets. What do you think it is?

    Posted

  • davidbundy77 by davidbundy77

    I agree this is very intriguing. It appears to be a semi-regular variable with a period of around 2.2 days, but there are also nice periodic U-shaped dips with a period of around 1.85 days starting at BKJD 2063.33 which repeat thoughout all three images. The clearest dips are consistently about 0.2 days long and 2% deep. Maybe it really is a planet. It would be interesting to read other opinions.

    Posted

  • Dolorous_Edd by Dolorous_Edd

    https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~avanderb/k2c2/ep205046529.html

    GO2003 Guenther Stellar activity of young stars as key for understanding the diversity of exoplanets: The case of Upper Scorpius OB association

    GO2020 Lodieu Finding transiting exoplanets in Upper Scorpius with Kepler K2

    GO2047 Brown Rotational Properties And Evolution Of Young Stars In Upper Sco: K2-field02

    GO2051 Stello Galactic Archaeology on a grand scale - Campaigns 2-3

    GO2052 Covey K2 Monitoring of Confirmed Members of Upper Sco + Rho Oph

    GO2069 Montet Targeting M dwarfs with K2

    enter image description here

    SDSS J161026.38-193951.2

    enter image description here

    Posted

  • davidbundy77 by davidbundy77

    Skyview

    Skyview

    There are some other stars nearby that might be contaminating the lightcurve.

    Posted

  • Dolorous_Edd by Dolorous_Edd in response to davidbundy77's comment.

    Not really, they are far away

    Could be a binary, looks extended in UKIRT and CFHT image

    CFHT R band

    enter image description here

    Period ~1.838d

    Quick & dirty phase folding

    enter image description here

    Posted

  • davidbundy77 by davidbundy77

    Thanks for the analysis. That looks pretty convincing to me.

    Posted