202083828 - PC or EB?
-
by Dolorous_Edd
Profile looks reasonably good, though with larger pixel mask anything is possible
Could be even contamination from BGEB ( dips at 1947.9BKJD and 1962 are veeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrry suspicious )
DSS 2 Red 1' x 1' field
Target is listed under GO0111_LC|GO0119_LC|GO0120_LC
GO0111 Sanchis Ojeda DETECTION OF EARTH-SIZE PLANETS USING K2
http://keplerscience.arc.nasa.gov/K2/docs/Campaigns/C0/GO0111_SanchisOjeda.pdf
GO0119 Montet TARGETING M DWARFS WITH K2
http://keplerscience.arc.nasa.gov/K2/docs/Campaigns/C1/GO1053_Montet.pdf
GO0120 Lepine NEARBY, HIGH PROPER MOTION M DWARFS FOR THE KEPLER K2 MISSION
Posted
-
by Dolorous_Edd
Also
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~avanderb/k2c0/ep202083828.html
Posted
-
by Shellface
Only one visible star in the aperture. The source's colours indicate a end-K spectral type (~0.6 Rsol and ~4000 K), so the transit depth suggests a radius of ~4 Rearth, or ~1 Rnept. This is an interesting candidate, but will be difficult to follow up due to the small size and faint host star.
Posted
-
by ajamyajax
My guess would be planetary, but only three transits to work with on this one.
s1=1942.163 p1=14.568 d1=0.23 (5.52 hours)
Posted
-
by Dolorous_Edd
Keppixseries for 202083828, I guess if there is a BGEB nearby we would have seen it now
Posted
-
by Dolorous_Edd
Redundant or not, here is the UKIRT and SDSS images
UKIRT
1'x1'
SDSS
Posted
-
by ajamyajax
Looks confirmed as K2-26 b now:
And maybe we were too caution here, but we certainly had it spotted as a PC.
Posted
-
by Dolorous_Edd
sigh .. oh well
Posted
-
by ajamyajax in response to Dolorous_Edd's comment.
No worries, there are always more. : )
Posted
-
by ajamyajax
Ivan, Hans Martin, Alex, et al. :
Just noticed we can get proper motions for K2 targets here:
Posted
-
by zoo3hans in response to ajamyajax's comment.
Hi Mark
thanks, also useful to get the magnitudes of the star, say V, B, K, J, H.
Posted
-
by zoo3hans
Confirmed also in http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.02706
P=14.5665 days, R=2.67 R_Earth.
Posted
-
by zoo3hans
And yet another confirmation (with the help of the Spitzer telescope):
http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01934
Posted